Monday, December 6, 2010

The Social Manifesto: An E-piphany About the Impact of New Technology

I’m on the plane returning from Munich, Germany, and I’m having a "Jerry McQuire" moment.

Today’s Financial Times has an article on Mark Zuckerberg entitled; ‘This is just the early stage.’ In the article, “Zuck,” as friends call him talks about the new technologies and enhancements Facebook will be rolling out soon.  One of which is Facebook Deals, which according to Zuck, will transform the way local businesses reach consumers as they walk down the street. I had to laugh when I read that, as I thought about my previous night’s experience at the Christmas Market in heart of old town (Altstadt) Munich.

For those of you who have never been to Germany in December, christmas markets start at the end of November and go through Christmas. The markets, that seem to occupy every square in town, are a mix of vendors selling everything from Gluhwein (a seasonal drink of warm wine) to Christmas ornaments of all types. But, what is must remarkable, is the experience that it creates.

The streets are filed with families, tourists, business people, and college students as they mix drinking, eating, socializing and shopping. I was in a packed square with fresh fallen snow, carolers atop of the Rathaus, with probably 5000 people jammed into a city block, surrounded by vendors and stores filled with shoppers. It’s as close to as you can get to seeing the North Pole and Santa’s workshop.

So, it struck me as funny that Zuck could think that he could change that experience with Facebook. Zuckerberg tells the reporter, David Gelles, that “Facebook’s unique map of human relationships will change business forever.”  To that I say, Facebook, and Zuck, you know nothing about human relationships, and, with the help of other new technologies, you are helping to destroy it.

You only need to watch a pack of teenage girls texting while at the mall, or a father on his blackberry at his child’s sporting event to see it. New technologies are enabling to us to be absent from the present…more so than ever. One thing I noticed last night was the revelers were not checking their phones or texting, they were in the moment, enjoying each other and soaking in the experience…except me.

I was busy sending texts and photos to my wife and my kids pretending that they were with me, when what I really wanted was to have them there or to hear their voices. It left me hollow, longing and lonely, the reason I’m having my Jerry McQuire moment.

New technologies are a double edged sword. They can enable good and bad, depending on how we used them. They promise greater “interactions” or “engagement” but that’s not to be confused with, or substituted for, relationships. They are not the same. And for business, don’t confuse your followers as loyal customers, because they are not. Most people are engaging for selfish reasons, they need or want something.  What they don’t want, or need, is a relationship with a vendor who only wants to sell them something.

What it has done is enable us to be more self-centered and lazy. "But Scott," you say, "how can that be? I’m busier than ever, new technologies are helping stay in touch.” Allow me to explain.

The phone eliminates the need to have to go see someone, email and text freed us having to place a call, and now you can simply tweet or post a comment and wait for someone to “Like” it, or leave a comment. No need to get involved, just do it and feedback will be sent to you. “Ah, 10 people like my comment…that makes me feel good.” Really?

Relationships take work and sometimes they can be painful, but they make us feel alive. They’re not easy, and you can’t automate them. Time is finite, and how we spend it, along with those experiences, helps define us. We can’t make more of it, or get it back. The more time we invest with technology means it is coming from something or someone, and it’s keeping us from something, or someone.

Perhaps what Facebook, and other technologies are doing is redefining how we think about ourselves. Technology allows us to express ourselves without having to invest a whole lot of time or emotion. We can go broad without having to go deep.

People now measure themselves by how many friends or followers they have. but what does that mean? To me it means that we are taking time away from family members or customers to interact with people who we don’t, or hardly, know. Why?  Because it’s easy, convenient, provides immediate gratification, and we can carry it around with us at all time…it’s a social security blanket.

The voice in our head saying; “just go online and see what people are posting on your wall, it’s happening now…you should check.”  It’s leading us down the wrong road. More time online means less time spent offline.  I went to Germany...and I almost missed being there.

Facebook now has over a half a billion users. It’s a runaway train.  It fills a need, but so does fast food. Plenty of people have told us that eating it is bad for us, but it’s convenient, cheap and the high salt content keeps us coming back for more. But just as fast food restaurants offer the 1000 calorie meal, they also offer healthy alternatives.  It’s up to us to make the right decision.

Our Facebook pages may feed the ego and give us a sense of immediacy, but it won’t nourish the soul, or satisfy our desire for intimacy.  To borrow liberally from Jerry McQuire; ”Technology, you don’t complete me…and you never will.”

Monday, November 22, 2010

Enabling Channel Partners to Effectively Sell to Small Business

On Wednesday the 17th I attended the Corporate Executive Board's Enterprise Council on Small Business member meeting in Philadelphia.  The meeting entitled Selecting and Building Channel Partnerships included attendees from about 10 member companies such as; Xerox, Symantec, Experian, Erie Insurance and Comcast, who hosted the event. 

ECSB practice leaders opened the meeting reviewing recent research on enabling channel partners to effectively sell to small business (title of the post).  The research compared the performance of high and low performing partner programs.  The meeting also included a review of best practice case studies.   Highlights from the research include:
  • How small business owners want to buy - business owners stated that the type of supplier most preferred was a local supplier (34%), followed by a sales rep selling multiple lines (26%).   Top 3 reasons they buy from a local supplier; 1) location, 2) know them personally, and 3) responsiveness (immediate answers to questions). 
  • What high performing partners want from companies - 1) Training (all types), 2) Evaluation (compensation related), and 3) Resources (access to information, additional infrastructure, etc.)   This was interesting because low performing partners ranked Leads as #1.  
  • High Performing vs Low Performing Partners - the size or maturity of the partner's business did not impact the findings, however the age of the ownership team did; younger partners performed better than their older peers.  
  • Partner Compensation - the preferred plan was overwhelmingly  "percentage of sales" 38%; flat $ per unit commission 17%, and discount (either dollar or percentage) was 13%.  
Highlights from the case studies and discussion:
  • Measuring Partner Performance - 61% of partners said that they are evaluated on a single metric. Number one metric "Volume of Sales".  Most of the attendees also agreed, only one had used an additional measurement for performance. 
  • Net Promoter - the additional metric used was a net promoter score to measure the performance of partners...really interestiing application of this tool
  • Using a Third Party Facilitator -  the use of a third party mediator was highlighted in one of the best practice case studies.  The company used an outside facilitator to help the two companies negogiate a partner agreement.   The goal of the mediator was to encourage honesty, and bring about an accurate appraisal of the relationship potential.  Really interesting process to get at what's in it for both parties, and for getting everyone aligned on expectations. 
My key takeaway was that there is a significant opportunity to improve partner performance that is being missed. The opportunity is directing partners to desired customers and/or market segments.   Granted some partners are selected just for that reason, but in general, companies do not typically articulate what customers they want or who are best for their products.  A couple of members mentioned that they organize products against customer segments and assume that points partners in the direction of those customers.  

I don't think that is enough.  At the end of the day, manufacturers know how to sell products better then partners.   As a result, they should know which customers/type of customer will most value their product or service, and those customers that will be most profitable and loyal.  Use this information to help partners understand, and identify what a good customer looks like, and why.  Give clear direction on what you want.  If there is one thing we've learned from previous research, it is clear communications with partners is highly valued, that in itself might be a win.

Monday, November 15, 2010

A Great Marketing Tool Built with Your Tax Dollars

There has been no shortage of criticism of how the federal government spends our tax dollars, in particular over the past two years.  But I found something recently that is worth every dollar, especially if you’re a marketer.  

The Department of Labor's Bureau of Labor and Statistics (BLS) has a fantastic website that includes excellent economic and employment reports, as well as, an incredibly robust and user-friendly database.  The BLS produces some very well known economic reports including the Consumer Price Index and the National Employment/Unemployment Rate. 
 
But it also contains a wealth of information for marketers.   Some of my favorite B2B BLS reports include:
My absolute favorite section is the Database, Tables and Calculators.  You could literally spend weeks in this section running reports.  Many vendors resell this information but given how tight budgets are nowadays, do it yourself.  The BLS can help you answer a wide variety of marketing related questions such as:
  • Want to understand how consumer spending varies by income?  Got it, Consumer Expenditure Survey.
  • Need to know how to modify pricing to adjust for inflation?  Check out the PPI
  • Want to evaluate which industry to target for a new product?  Go hunting in the Industries at a Glance section. 
The BLS website is a great tool for conducting research on market segments, demographic trends, and consumer habits and spending.  It also an invaluable tool for understanding the health of the economy, price forecasting, etc.

You’re paying for it so help yourself, and for once, feel good about your tax dollars at work.  

Friday, November 5, 2010

Social Media as a Sale Tool - Section 5

The following post is taken from the soon to be released white paper entitled: The Effect of the Great Recession and the Rise of Social Media on Sales & Marketing Integration 
SOCIAL MEDIA AS A SALES TOOL //
Although the use of social media is now becoming widely considered and adopted by marketing organizations, it has yet to be accepted by many salespeople. As part of Channel Marketing’s research effort, the team explored areas where social media tools could provide value in the sales process.  As featured in Figure 5, a simple two by two approach is mapped out along a common six-step sales process on one axis and the “BANT”(Budget, Authority, Need and Timeline) lead qualification process is aligned to the other axis.
Figure 5 shows opportunities in the sales process to apply social media tools to accelerate the lead management process and improve account management and support (the bottom of the funnel activities) based on what sales people and customers are trying to accomplish during those steps.
Utilizing social media at the beginning of the sales process, many B2B firms are increasingly using those tools as prospecting devices.  Studies such as David Gode’s publication in the Harvard Business Review on Better Sales Networks, suggest that to be successful at sourcing prospects, a salesperson’s network should be made up of contacts that are diverse in functional role and industry.
As a result, LinkedIn and similar platforms are helping salespeople create a more efficient marketplace network where each contact knows a more diverse array of people, creating a wider web of prospects. Identified prospects can also be used to help grow opportunities for buy-in and up-sell by allowing a salesperson to build relationships with individuals at a company beyond his or her immediate network.
Beyond opportunity identification, social media can address the problem of stalled opportunities. According to the Sales, Marketing and Communication Leadership Council, the most important front-line manager activity to drive growth is sales innovation, namely collaborating with reps to ‘unstick’ deals.  Often times, the culprit for a “stuck” or delayed deal is merely the fact that one or more identifiable ‘BANT’ lead qualification elements have not been met. 
While in many cases B2B sales and marketing teams have ready access to the necessary information regarding budget, authority and timing, Figure 5 highlights social media’s coverage and the specific tools that address customer’s “Need” applied to the sales setting.
As mapped out in Figure 5, it is clear that organizations are using social media to help better understand, anticipate and address customer and prospect needs. Allstate agents, for example, created a community portal on a Ning platform that provides agents with an online discussion area to post and answer questions, send out bulletins, blog about events, and share useful knowledge. Allstate news headlines on the site keep agents up to date and the network provides agents the chance to connect with each other and share insight with only a few keystrokes.
To read more continue to the post.   

Tuesday, October 26, 2010

The Shift to Social Media - Section 2 of the White Paper

The following post is taken from the soon to be released white paper entitled: The Effect of the Great Recession and the Rise of Social Media on Sales & Marketing Integration 
THE SHIFT TO SOCIAL MEDIA //
The migration towards the “connected” world can be witnessed by the millions of individuals flooding to sites such as Facebook, LinkedIn, and Twitter. This has in turn created a robust cache of potential customers for marketers to interact with and engage. Indeed widespread social media use pervades much of the B2B space as a recent Forrester Research piece outlines how B2B buyers have very high social participation and provides relevant statistics such as the fact that 88% of decision makers at business technology firms use social media for business decision-making[i].
As Figure 1 demonstrates, recent statistics reveal that marketers, in large numbers, are following prospects and customers into the digital and social media world for two primary reasons[ii]:
·       Prospects and customers have exhibited a desire to use these platforms.
·       Recent economic conditions have made this targeted and inexpensive marketing method very appealing to marketing and sales forces with declining budgets.
As evidence of the depth to which “The Great Recession” has slashed marketing budgets, in a survey in 2009, 75% of B2B marketers reported a decrease in their budgets, while 67% of marketers complained of being expected to do more with less by driving higher sales with these diminished budgets[iii]
Figure 2 demonstrates the degree to which average total advertising expenditure has decreased from 2007 to 2009 as a result of smaller marketing budgets. In addition, the figure reveals the shift in focus of this advertising spend away from traditional forms of marketing in favor of the internet and online media. Despite budget cuts, the recession has actually accelerated the adoption of social media marketing as companies have increasingly turned to social media as an inexpensive, measurable and direct method over traditional approaches.


[i] Burris, Peter, Josh Bernoff, Bradford J. Holmes, and Zachary Reiss-Davis. The Social Technographics of Business Buyers. Rep. Forrester Research, February 20, 2009.
[ii]The B-to-B Marketing Leadership Study”. American Business Media, Association of National Advertisers, and Booz & Co. August 2010. 
[iii] Maddox, Katie. "Survey Finds Budget Cuts Easing." BtoB Magazine 14 Sept. 2009: 1+. Print.